This photograph was taken somewhere over the Atlantic Ocean in June 2003. It was originally published on the DoD
DEFEND AMERICA and
AIR FORCE LINK websites in July & September 2003. Also, it was printed in the Army's
SOLDIER'S MAGAZINE in November 2003 (
Page 22):
Army Sgt. Osvaldo Ortiz sleeps next to the transfer case and gear of his fallen friend aboard a C-17 Globemaster III aircraft bound for Dover Air Force Base, Del. Ortiz is accompanying the remains to the base and eventually back to the fallen soldier's home in Puerto Rico. U.S. Army photo by Staff Sgt. Peter Rimar
Media Background: In the latest
LIFE book
Photography Exposed: The Story Behind The Image, the authors highlighted one story about a Tami Silicio. Working as a Defense Department contractor at
Kuwait International Airport, Ms. Silicio became famous for snapping a series of photos of flag draped-coffins. Within 11 days of taking a few pictures, one photo found its way onto the front page of the Seattle Times. According to the
LIFE article, as a result of Ms. Silicio's actions, both her and her husband were fired by Maytag Aircraft.
Since the beginning of the wars in Afghanistan & Iraq, the Department of Defense followed a strict policy regarding the photographing of coffins arriving at Dover Air Force Base, Delaware. This DoD policy, initiated in 1991 by then-Secretary of Defense Richard Cheney, included news coverage of the transportation and arrival of those killed-in-action. After a successful
lawsuit (April 2005) brought by Ralph Begleiter, a University of Delaware journalism professor, more than 700 DoD images taken at Dover and other locations were released to the media.
The National Security Archive website, published by The George Washington University, provides further historical background on the original ban of media coverage of returning casualties.
THE STORY BEHIND THE IMAGE:
It was almost 2 a.m. when Erich and I finally boarded the C-17 for our long journey home. Actually, the day had started 20 hours earlier in northern
Afghanistan .

Earlier in the week, we had traveled to the town of Konduz to film a humanitarian mission (see
HometownLink ).
For two days, a team of
U.S. Army Doctors and Nurses had set up a field clinic for the local farmers. It was a great story to cover. The whole affair was a scene right out of
National Geographics.
Amazingly, some Afghanis had walked for days just to be seen by these medics.

As the Burka-covered wifes & daughters were being treated by the female medics...the local men
showed-off their donkeys like
Buicks at a classic car show. For this remote farming community, the circus had come to Konduz and everyone wanted to show up for the party...
Anyhow, despite all the excitement of the previous few days, when I boarded the plane at Bagram Air Base, the true human impact of this war was immediately put back into perspective. In that single moment, I came face-to-face with the continuation of 9-11.
Three flag-draped coffins...
Three fellow soldiers making their final journey home...While SGT Ortiz sat beside me for the take-offs and landings, for most of the flight, he kept a close watch over his fallen buddys' gear. The
Army sent SGT Ortiz home to accompany his comrade and give the family back his personal effects. Throughout the flight, he remained a loyal soldier and friend.
As for myself, I waited 17 hours for just the right moment to snap this picture. While I took more than 200 photographs in Konduz...the dedication and loyality displayed by SGT Ortiz on that flight created an enduring image...and touched my heart forever...
FINAL NOTE:
In 25 years of service as a military broadcaster, I have never been
censored . My job is to tell soldier stories. For the record, NO ONE has ever confronted me for taking the
Old Glory photograph. While I understand the reasons behind Mr. Begleiter's original lawsuit, perhaps his lawyers should have done some more homework. Photographs with flag-draped coffins had been released to the media.

The question remains: Where does a family's right to privacy end and the publics' right to know begin?
Page 2